Preview Mode Links will not work in preview mode

Joe Pisapia (@JoePisapia17), Dan Harris (@danharris80), Kyle Yates (@KyleYNFL), and Pat Fitzmaurice (@Fitz_FF) host lively discussions with our network of 200+ experts. Together, our hosts will continue to honor and maintain the legacy of our late friend and colleague, Mike Tagliere, by doing the very best they can to keep you both informed and entertained. Find out who the experts have on their “must-draft” lists and the sleepers they’re targeting. During the season, we’ll help you spot hidden gems on the Waiver Wire and offer analysis that will help with Start/Sit decisions. Got a question you want answered on the show?  for our listener mailbag.

Sep 30, 2016

Doug Norrie (@DougNorrie) of Daily Fantasy Sports Rankings joins us to cover Week 4 from a daily fantasy perspective. We being by discussing quarterbacks and decide who is a better expensive cash game play between Cam Newton and Drew Brees (4:28), our top value QBs (7:58), and we give a few contrarian plays that could end up in million dollar winning lineups (12:01). Moving on to running backs, we discuss who could be the top owned player this week and if he's worth fading (15:55), how to treat lower priced backup players with good opportunities (17:16), which obscure player could finish with the highest score (24:29), and we give our predictions on who could finish with the most carries in Week 4 (28:26). We continue with wide receivers beginning with whether we think Antonio Brown is worth his massive price (32:10), cheap players we think could score enough points to be value plays (35:35), our favorite options in PPR formats (39:17), and who between Marvin Jones, Kelvin Benjamin or Stefon Diggs will have the best week (43:08). Our tight end discussion features Rob Gronkowski (45:55) and Hunter Henry (47:39), then we cover defenses and examine the projected best plays and some possible contrarian options (48:40). We finish with stacks and give our safest picks, along with stacks that have a chance to score points despite possible low ownership (52:02).